Michigan bans smartphones during class: What the new law means for students

Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer has signed a statewide law restricting smartphone use during instructional time in public schools, formalising a policy shift that will take effect at the start of the 2026 to 2027 academic year.The legislation requires public school districts across Michigan to limit smartphone use during classroom instruction, while allowing students to carry phones on campus. The measure follows months of bipartisan negotiations in the Legislature and aligns Michigan with a growing number of states adopting similar restrictions.According to the Associated Press, Whitmer said ahead of the bill signing at Waverly High School that phones “impede a student’s ability to learn” and are a major distraction during lessons.

What the law changes

Under the new statute, students will not be permitted to use smartphones during instructional time. However, they may access their devices between classes or at lunch.Students may carry basic mobile phones capable of calls and text messages but not social media or internet browsing. Each district will determine how strictly the rules are enforced and how devices are stored or monitored during the school day.The law applies only to public school districts. Private and parochial schools are not covered.Districts must publish their cellphone policies online and outline enforcement procedures. The legislation does not specify penalties for districts that fail to comply.

Exceptions and emergency protocols

The statute does not restrict medically necessary devices that operate through smartphones, such as glucose monitors. District-owned devices designated for instructional purposes are also permitted.A companion measure sponsored by Dayna Polehanki requires schools to establish protocols governing smartphone use during emergencies, including active shooter situations or bomb threats. Schools must clarify when and how students may access their devices in such cases.Polehanki said the law places the authority of state statute behind a standard many educators already support.

A bipartisan compromise

The policy emerged from separate proposals advanced by the Democratic-led Senate and the Republican-led House. Lawmakers reached a compromise earlier this year to create what supporters describe as a baseline statewide standard.State Representative Mark Tisdel, a Republican from Rochester Hills and sponsor of the House version, said the goal was to establish a consistent framework while allowing districts flexibility in implementation. He added that lawmakers could revisit the policy if educators seek changes after observing its effects.

Michigan joins a national trend

When Whitmer first proposed limiting classroom smartphone use during her 2025 State of the State address, nine states had enacted similar bans. That number has since grown to roughly three dozen.Some states have adopted stricter models. In New York, lawmakers approved a bell-to-bell restriction requiring schools to store devices throughout the entire school day, including lunch and passing periods. Texas has implemented a broader ban covering smartphones, smartwatches and tablets during the full school day.Whitmer cited early reports from other states suggesting improvements in classroom behaviour and academic focus.

Local experience before the mandate

Several Michigan districts had already implemented their own restrictions before the law’s passage. At Waverly High School, where the bill signing took place, educators reported changes in student engagement after limiting phone access.According to the Associated Press, a mathematics teacher at the school said students were more attentive and participatory when devices were removed during instruction.

What students may experience

The immediate effect for students will be procedural rather than structural. Phones remain allowed on campus, but instructional periods will be device-free.Over time, the policy may test whether reduced digital distraction improves classroom focus, behavioural outcomes and academic performance. Much will depend on how districts design enforcement mechanisms and how consistently policies are applied.For now, Michigan has established a statewide floor rather than a ceiling. The coming academic year will determine whether lawmakers consider strengthening the restrictions or maintaining a model that balances access with instructional control.